Home Research Museum Events Education Gift Store Kids Page Donations

The Korean War

Holding the Line: August 24-28, 1950

accounts
Foreign policy questions predominate discussions in Washington. Public statements by United Nations Commander Douglas MacArthur and Navy Secretary Francis Matthews prompt controvery.

[Executive Secretary to the National Security Council] Jimmy Lay said this morning that he was somewhat surprised at the last State Department’s drafts . . . . He pointed out that the President had asked for policy recommendations on what we do when we reach the 38th Parallel [the pre-war border between South and North Korea]. Jimmy said that he could hardly understand how, in the light of the President’s specific request [on whether to advance militarily across the parallel in an effort to reunite the country], we could reply to the President merely stating that we have no policy recommendations at this time.

State Department Staff Assistant to the National Security Council Max Bishop
Max Bishop to Philip Jessup, August 24, 1950
Foreign Relations of the United States, Volume VII, Korea

[Upon the creation of the National Security Council (NSC) in 1947] President Truman said he wanted me to take it over as a personal favor, but he said he would let me out any time I wanted to go, anytime I could tell him I had an organization set up that would run well. I continued on as Executive Secretary until January 1950, and President Truman named then the gentleman I had brought in as my possible, or potential successor, James S. Lay. I agreed to continue as a consultant to the President in the same field in which I had been working . . . .

Our purpose was to develop in the National Security Council an organization which would serve as a staff no matter what administration might be in power. They were selected for their objectivity and their lack of political tie-ins. They were supposed to stay out of politics . . . . President Truman was always determined to keep politics out of national security problems. All the time I served with him . . . never once did he show any interest in partisan politics, either in the selection of men or on acting upon advice given to him. Really, for a man who was supposed to be partisan he was the most un-partisan man I have seen in that area. . . .

Special Consultant to the President Sydney Souers
Presidential memoirs interview, February 15, 1954
Papers of Harry S. Truman: Post Presidential Files

         

[Special Consultant to the President] Admiral [Sydney] Souers, wartime naval intelligence officer, Midwestern businessman, and good friend of President Truman's, had been the first secretary of the National Security Council. He had given the council's staff its stamp as a nonpartisan, neutral, careerist "secretariat," a conception reduced almost to caricature by his hand-picked, but far less personally influential successor, James Lay.

When Lay succeeded to the secretaryship, Souers remained on hand several days a week, as a consultant to the President. In this capacity he served as a sort of informal father-confessor and guardian for Lay, an elder-statesman-type personal adviser to the President, and an informal link between them, present at Lay’s daily briefings of the President, confidante to both.

In other words, Souers served as a sort of super-secretary of the NSC, not a personal substitution for the secretariat's neutrality, but part of it himself. He did not function as the presidential alter ego on the NSC, or even as the NSC staff channel back to his White House colleagues. He was rather a quiet participant in the direct relationship between the President and Lay, close-mouthed with his White House colleagues, concerned neither to represent their interest to Lay, nor Lay's to them.

The gap between the White House staff, as a politically oriented, totally presidential entity, and the neutral secretariat of NSC was never bridged in Truman's time on any systematic basis. . . . This had very serious consequences for the evolution of the NSC and for its utility as Presidential staff machinery; consequences of which Souers and Lay were not unaware. But for one reason or another, the missing link was never forged in Truman's time . . . .

Richard Neustadt
Notes on the White House Staff under President Truman, June 1953
Papers of Richard Neustadt

         

On a Friday night . . . [a State Department press relations specialist] called me up and said he had gotten something over the AP [Associated Press] ticker which I ought to see, and he got in a car and came out to the country and showed me the yellow ticker of the famous letter of August 24th which General [Douglas] MacArthur [commander in the Far East] wrote to the 51st encampment of the Veterans of Foreign Wars. I read this, and was considerably excited by it. . . . The atmosphere and the background of this letter is really the disturbing part of it - was at that time. Here we were having a very difficult and serious fight going on in Korea - this was before the battle had been fully stabilized . . . . At any rate, I read this thing with considerable worry. I telephoned [Special Assistant to the President W.] Averell [Harriman] and told him that the thing existed . . . .

Secretary of State Dean Acheson
"Princeton Seminar" comment, February 14, 1954
Papers of Dean Acheson

         

. . . [General Douglas] MacArthur had sent a letter to Clyde A. Lewis, Commander in Chief of the Veterans of Foreign Wars [VFW], which he had requested. It was to be read at their national convention in Chicago. At the outset of the Korean conflict, the President had laid down a very firm policy concerning the Nationalist Chinese Government of Chiang Kai-shek on the island of Formosa and concerning Red China. In one of his first statements about the Korean conflict . . . he had stated that he was assigning the Seventh Fleet to patrol the straits of Formosa to prevent Chiang Kai-shek, the Nationalist leader, from launching any attack on Red China, which would have enlarged the war. At the same time, it prevented Communist China from taking advantahe of the situation and attacking Formosa, which they had long threatened to do. There was the possibility that any attack by Chiang’s Chinese Nationalist troops would bring on a third world war. Now, MacArthur was opposed to this policy. Instead of keeping it to himself, he began stating it publicly. This was the burden of the letter that he wrote the VFW Commander, Lewis, in August to be read at their convention in Chicago. . . . Here . . . was a five star general defying the firm policy laid down by the White House and his Government in Washington.

International News Service White House Correspondent Robert Nixon
Oral history interview November 5, 1970

         

At 9 A.M., Saturday, August 26, [Special Assistant W.] Aver[e]ll Harriman took the President a copy of a press release containing the text of General [Douglas] MacArthur's message to the 51st Regiment Encampment of the Veterans of Foreign Wars. This press release related to the foreign policy of the United States, with particular reference to Formosa.

The President read the release and discussed it with Mr. Harriman.

At 9:30 A.M., Secretary of Defense [Louis] Johnson, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Secretary of State [Dean Acheson], Mr. Harriman, [Press Secretary to the President] Mr. [Charles] Ross, Administrative Assistant to the President] Mr. [George] Elsey, [Army Aide to the President] General [Harry] Vaughan and [Naval Aide to the President] Admiral [Robert] Dennison met with the President for [Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff] General [Omar] Bradley's customary briefing on the military situation. After General Bradley had concluded his short presentation, [Army Chief of Staff] General [J. Lawton] Collins and [Chief of Naval Operations] Admiral [Forrest] Sherman in turn gave an account of their recent visit to Japan and Tokyo.

Following their remarks, the President said that he wished to read a statement from General MacArthur. The President then read a copy of the . . . 7-page release. Upon concluding the reading, the President turned to Secretary Johnson and stated that he decisively repudiated the statements MacArthur had made, that MacArthur had made statements in direct contradiction of the foreign policy of the United States . . . .

Administrative Assistant to the President George Elsey
Memorandum for file, August 26, 1950
Papers of George M. Elsey

         

The President . . . was obviously very mad indeed. And he read this whole document through, from beginning to end, and said that [General Douglas] MacArthur had sent this to the Veterans of Foreign Wars; it was over the open telegraph, and it was on the AP ticker, and he didn’t see how this could have been done without somebody in the Government of the United States knowing about it, and he said “I’m going to ask everyone in this room, individually, whether they had anything to do with this, whether they knew anything about it, whether they were connected in any way whatever with it.” And he pointed to each person in the room and went all around-they were like a lot of schoolboys, but they had to answer saying “No, sir” . . . .

Secretary of State Dean Acheson
"Princeton Seminar" comment, February 14, 1954
Papers of Dean Acheson

         

In obvious consternation, [Defense] Secretary [Louis] Johnson rose to his feet and stated that he had no previous knowledge of the [Douglas] MacArthur statement [to the Veterans of Foreign Wars] and that he would call [General] MacArthur immediately and request him to cancel the statement in question. The President swung his chair around, and facing [Army Chief of Staff] General [J. Lawton] Collins directly, he asked the General [who had just returned from visiting MacArthur’s headquarters in Tokyo] if he had any knowledge of MacArthur's statements. General Collins replied that he had not. . . . [Special Assistant W. Averell] Harriman spoke up in emphatic tones about the catastrophe that would attend the release of MacArthur's statement. The President concurred. Secretary [of State Dean] Acheson then spoke very briefly, stating that he concurred in Mr. Harriman's views, and that the MacArthur statement on the Far Eastern Policy was in complete variance with the position of the United States Government as expressed by Ambassador Warren Austin at the United Nations meeting in New York on Friday, August 25.

Administrative Assistant to the President George Elsey
Memorandum for file, August 26, 1950
Papers of George M. Elsey

         

Well, by the time the President got through with that, it was a thoroughly intimidated group; and he then turned to [Defense Secretary] Louis Johnson and said, “I want this letter [to the Veterans of Foreign Wars] withdrawn, and I want you to send an order to [General Douglas] MacArthur to withdraw this letter, and that is an order from me. Do you understand that?” Louis said, “Yes, sir, I do.” And the President said, “Go and do it. That’s all.” And that was the end of the meeting; everybody went out and disappeared very fast.

Shortly after that, about thirty minutes after that, Louis Johnson called me up and said that they’d been talking about this - with [Deputy Secretary of Defense] Steve Early and others, over at the Defense Department, at the Pentagon - and he didn’t see that this order of the President’s made any sense: you couldn’t withdraw a letter which was already on the ticker. I said “Louis, don’t argue with me as to whether the President’s order makes sense or not. I heard him give it, and you accepted it; and whether it can be done or not, you’d better do it. He wants that order sent to MacArthur.” Well Louis had a long talk with me, and finally I said, I’m not going to enter into this discussion at all. The President gave you an order and I have nothing in the world to do with it, and I’m not going to be a party to discussing whether the President knows what he’s doing or not.” Then I telephoned [Special Assistant W.] Averell [Harriman] and told him about this and said that he might expect some similar calls; which occurred as soon as he’d hung up the receiver from talking to me, Louis had him on the phone. And this went on for an hour or so; I must have had two or three calls from Johnson, I don’t know how many Averell had. Finally I said, I wasn’t going to talk with him any more, I wouldn’t answer the telephone if he called me; the President had given the order; the order must be carried out; and that was all there was to it.

Secretary of State Dean Acheson
"Princeton Seminar" comment, February 14, 1954
Papers of Dean Acheson

         

The meeting broke up with the promise by [Defense] Secretary [Louis] Johnson that he would instruct [General Douglas] MacArthur to cancel the [controversial] message [to the Veterans of Foreign Wars].

A half hour later, . . . [Press Secretary Charles] Ross, [Special Consultant] Admiral [Sydney] Souers, and [Administrative Assistant] . . . [George] Elsey went in to see the President to explain to him the conviction that MacArthur should be ordered in writing, and not simply orally as Secretary Johnson proposed to do, that the statement on Formosa should be withdrawn.

About 12 noon, Mr. Ross called [Deputy Defense Secretary] Steve Early to find out what had transpired. Early admitted that nothing had been done about the MacArthur statement and that he and Johnson were trying to draft a statement on the following lines: That if any questions arose in Washington about MacArthur's statement to the Veterans of Foreign Wars, the reply would be that the administration had no prior knowledge of it.

Ross told Early that was emphatically not enough, and that it was not in accord with what Johnson had promised the President to do. Ross sent out an alarm for . . . [Special Assistant W. Averell] Harriman, and Harriman and Ross together went in to see the President. Ross told the President that Defense seemed to be weak and indecisive. Upon hearing this, the President called Secretary Johnson on the phone and told him that he wished MacArthur "ordered" in writing to withdraw his statement to the Veterans of Foreign Wars. The President told Johnson exactly what he wanted inserted in the [Department of Defense] message [of August 26, 1950, ordering the withdrawal of MacArthur's statement to the Veterans of Foreign Wars].

The balance of the morning was spent in routine checks by Ross and Harriman in making sure that Johnson had carried out the President's orders.

>From one to three o'clock (P.M.), Ross, Harriman, [Assistant Press Secretary to the President Eben] Ayers and Elsey discussed the manner in which this episode should be treated with the press.

Administrative Assistant to the President George Elsey
Memorandum for file, August 26, 1950
Papers of George M. Elsey

         

During our session in [Press Secretary] Charlie Ross’ office with [Special Assistant W. Averell] Harriman and [Administrative Assistant George] Elsey there was much discussion of [the aborted message to the Veterans of Foreign Wars] . . . and of the situation that has arisen through the activities of Secretary of Defense [Louis] Johnson, who is known to be opposing Secretary of State [Dean] Acheson. Harriman told us that when he recently went to Tokyo he told MacArthur directly that he should not take such a position [regarding China].

[General Douglas] MacArthur is regarded as a Republican and seemingly is playing the Republican line in Far Eastern and Asian policy.

Assistant Press Secretary to the President Eben Ayers
Diary entry, August 26, 1950
Papers of Eben A. Ayers

         

It is significant, of course, that within a couple weeks of the time I got back [from discussion of the Far East situation with General Douglas MacArthur on August 6 and 8 in Tokyo] he sent this message to the Veterans of Foreign Wars which, of course is a matter of record, which disturbed the President greatly and if it hadn’t been for the military operations, the President has consistently said that he might well have taken some action at that time. He felt MacArthur had disobeyed instruction and orders, and hadn’t lived up to his statement to me [in Korea that he would not contradict the administration’s policy in the Far East]. . . .

This [order to withdraw MacArthur’s message] was entirely the President's action; . . . [Secretary of State Dean Acheson] and I made no recommendation to him. But after he had done it, I think . . . [we] both felt that it was very important to carry through his order for two reasons: one, that MacArthur should recognize that the President was insisting upon his carrying out his orders which had been an experience that MacArthur had never had; and secondly, that . . . MacArthur’s letter would have less significance in the eyes of the world if it were clear that the President had ordered him to withdraw it.

Special Assistant to the President W. Averell Harriman
"Princeton Seminar" comment, February 14, 1954
Papers of Dean Acheson

         

General [Douglas] MacArthur has always pretty much gone his own way. I remember a remark made at the time by a gen­eral who was senior to MacArthur, on the retired list. He said, “MacArthur said he never failed to obey an order. I never knew him . . . when he did.” That was his reputation among his contemporaries.

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Omar Bradley
Presidential memoirs interview, March 30, 1955
Papers of Harry S. Truman: Post Presidential Papers

         

The President . . . . issued an order that “I order [General Douglas] MacArthur to withdraw that statement [to the Veterans of Foreign Wars].” I had that [withdrawal] order issued, just one sentence, a wire.

Before we left, the question came up--I don’t know who asked it, I think it was the President--as to how the message got in this country, if it came by communication to the Military Establishment. I said I thought if it had, that I would have heard of it. . . .

Oh, around 10:30, 11 o’clock, I heard from one of the generals, then from [Secretary of the Army] Frank Pace, that there had been an error. [MacArthur's command in] Tokyo had asked for communications . . . . Army communications had been used to send that message some several days before that time.

I went over to see the President . . . [in the early afternoon] without appointment, because unintentionally I had not told him the truth that day . . . . The President was quite indignant. There was discussion at that time between the President and myself about relieving MacArthur as Korean commander, not in any other field, as I recall it.

It is permissable, I think, to state the conclusion that we would do nothing about [dismissing MacArthur] . . . at that time. . . . That is the only discussion of that type I ever had with the President.

Secretary of Defense Louis Johnson
Congressional testimony, June 14, 1951

         

After [Special Assistant W. Averell] Harriman left, [Administrative Assistant George] Elsey, [Press Secretary Charles] Ross and I talked for some time about [Defense Secretary Louis] Johnson’s activities. The situation has become almost impossible, yet there seems no way at this time for the president to get rid of him. The president is fully aware of his actions but realizes that were he to dismiss Johnson at this time it would arouse a storm and provide further ammunition for the critics and opponents, particularly during the political campaign.

Johnson is consumed by an inordinate ambition. He wants to be president, and it is felt that he is without principle in furthering his ambitions - that he would have no hesitancy, if such a thing were possible, in turning to the Republicans if he could not get the Democratic nomination, and that he would not hesitate to attempt to get the Democratic nomination even against the president, should the president decide to run again.

We discussed possibilities for the cabinet post, should Johnson be let out. . . . It was pretty well agreed that nothing can be done before election, unless something further develops that makes it absolutely necessary.

The speech delivered by [Navy Secretary Francis] Matthews last night [at the Boston Navy Yard raising the specter of a preventive war with the Soviet Union, "instituting a war to compel cooperation for peace,"] brought queries from newspaper men during the day. The State Department issued a statement disavowing it and we merely said we had no comment but, in answer to questions, said that the speech had not been cleared at the White House.

Assistant Press Secretary to the President Eben Ayers
Diary entry, August 26, 1950
Papers of Eben A. Ayers

         

[General Douglas] MacArthur is acting up, as is the Secretary of Defense [Louis Johnson].

President Harry S. Truman
Handwritten note, August 27, 1950
Papers of Harry S. Truman: President's Secretary's File

         

I got another telephone call from [Defense Secretary] Louis Johnson which said that he had gotten a message back from [General Douglas] MacArthur saying that if the President wanted him to withdraw this letter [to the Veterans of Foreign Wars], he would send a message and tell them that it was withdrawn, but he didn’t see what in the world he’d done wrong and what was there? He [MacArthur] thought this was the clear policy of the Government and he didn’t understand all this commotion. . . . So Louis said, “What shall I do?” I said, “I suppose you’d better carry out the President’s order. You told MacArthur to withdraw it; he sent you a message to be forwarded withdrawing it; why argue about it?” . . .

I tell this long story [of the events of August 26] here because . . . whenever an issue comes up with MacArthur . . . there is great difficulty in getting a firm attitude in dealing with MacArthur in the Pentagon. Well, after several talks back and forth, I think I got a call from the President who said he’d had a call from Louis and there was a long lot of stuff that he couldn’t understand and what did I make out of it. “Well,” I said, “I make out of it that MacArthur was trying to get out of doing what the President had told him to do, but had sent a message complying with the President’s order, and he’d better go ahead and do it.” The President said he thought this was right, but couldn’t make any head or tail out of what Louis Johnson was saying. At any rate, that was then withdrawn [on August 27] and there was quite a hullabaloo in the press, because they all printed the letter and they all printed the fact that the letter was withdrawn. But there was one good effect of it, which was that the President had stood up to MacArthur and had taken no nonsense within the limits of what you could do in this rather difficult situation.

Secretary of State Dean Acheson
"Princeton Seminar" comment, February 14, 1954
Papers of Dean Acheson

         

I do not believe we [the Joint Chiefs of Staff] actually differed at all [with the views expressed by General Douglas MacArthur in his message to the Veterans of Foreign Wars], Senator, but my recollection of it was that the thing that did disturb us about that was the sort of imputation contained in the letter that we wanted Formosa as a military base. . . . That could be read into the letter, into that letter, and . . . the Joint Chiefs of Staff did not support it [major U.S. forces on Formosa]; but there was nothing, no clear-cut difference between the views of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and those expressed by General MacArthur in this particular paper, or letter.

Army Chief of Staff General J. Lawton Collins
Congressional testimony, May 25, 1951

         

Yesterday, the 26th [of August, 1950,] I listened to a report from [Army Chief of Staff] General [J. Lawton] Collins and [Naval Chief of Operations] Adm. [Forrest] Sherman, who had been on a tour of Korea. They gave me a good report. The general told me that we have a good field commander in Gen. [Walton] Walker. The Admiral said our sea forces have a high morale as the General said of the land forces. Both assured me that ground, sea, and air forces are in complete harmony including the Marines! That's really something.

President Harry S. Truman
Handwritten note, August 27, 1950
Papers of Harry S. Truman: President's Secretary's File

         

Meanwhile the State Department was concerned over the situation in the United Nations [stemming from General Douglas MacArthur’s message to the Veterans of Foreign Wars and the subsequent order from the President that the message be withdrawn], and the State Department drafted a letter for the President to send to [Ambassador to the United Nations] Warren Austin, and did persuade the President to speak to Austin by phone. The text of the letter [reiterating U.S. policy on Formosa] was released on Monday, 28 August[,] at 10 A.M.

Administrative Assistant to the President George Elsey
Memorandum for file, October 2, 1950
Papers of George M. Elsey

         

To the office before 9 a.m. and had been in only a few minutes when [Special Assistant W.] Averell Harriman came in the office and sat down to look over the papers and see what had developed in the MacArthur case. . . .

[Press Secretary] Charlie Ross came in and we arranged for a 10 a.m. press conference. At that time it was learned that the U. S News [and World Report] . . . had the text of the MacArthur message [to the Veterans of Foreign Wars] in type and copies of the magazine were in the mail. Also the Chicago Tribune had printed it in a late edition this morning.

Ross informed the newspapermen that the President had ordered MacArthur to withdraw the message. He said, for quotation and attribution: “In order to avoid confusion as to the United States position with respect to Formosa, the President directed that the statement prepared by General MacArthur on this subject be withdrawn.”

He also gave out copies of a letter by Warren Austin, U.S. Representa­tive to the United Nations, to Trygvie Lie, secretary general, on August 25, and previously made public, and a letter dated yesterday, from the President to Austin. He also talked at length, not for attribution to him, on the U.S. policy. He permitted quotation, but not attribution to him, of this statement: “In the field of foreign relations there can be but one voice. The President’s policy must stand as the official policy of the United States.” . . .

The President held his usual Monday morning meeting, at 10 o’clock, with the Congressional leaders and [Chairman of the Joint Chiefs] General [Omar] Bradley was in then for his regular briefing on the Korean situation.

Our staff meeting was at 11 o’clock. There was little discussion of the MacArthur episode.

Questions were asked about any further developments in the case of Secretary of the Navy [Francis] Matthews and his ill-advised speech in Boston last week [raising the possibility of a preemptive war with the Soviet Union]. Ross said the President had talked with Matthews this morning and that the incident was closed.

I was told, however, that in the telephone conversation Matthews expressed a willingness if it was embarrassing to the President, to tender his resignation. The President told him to forget it.

Matthews, Charlie told me, said he wrote the speech aboard a plane, finishing about 3 o’clock in the morning. He sent a copy to the defense establishment for clearance but did not follow it up. Instead he went on to Boston and delivered it without any further word and apparently the speech reached the Defense department too late to be cleared.

Assistant Press Secretary to the President Eben Ayers
Diary entry, August 28, 1950
Papers of Eben A. Ayers

         

After the information brought back by General [J. Lawton] Collins and Admiral [Forrest] Sherman [on the plans for Operation Chromite, the landing at Inchon, as outlined in an August 23 briefing in Tokyo] we concur in making preparations and executing a turning movement by amphibious forces on the west coast of Korea either at Inchon in the event that enemy defenses in the Inchon prove ineffective or at a favorable beach south of Inchon if one can be located. We further concur in preparation, if desired by CINCFE [Commander in Chief Far East Command Douglas MacArthur], for an envelopment by amphibious forces in the vicinity of Kunsan [100 miles south of Inchon and likely a safer choice for a landing].

The Joint Chiefs of Staff
Joint Chiefs of Staff to Douglas MacArthur, August 28, 1950

     
Back to Holding the Line
Go to August 19-23, 1950
August 29-September 4, 1950

 Document links
August 24-28, 1950
See the record from which the decisions were made
  • The President's News Conference, August 24, 1950
    Public Papers of the President, 1950.
  • Statement to the 51st National Encampment of the Veterans of Foreign Wars by General Douglas MacArthur discussing U.S. foreign and military policy in the Far East. Papers of Harry S. Truman: President's Secretary's Files. (7 pages)
  • "Memorandum for record of the events of Saturday August 26, 1950," by Lucius Battle recounting the discussions surrounding the Presidential order for withdrawal of MacArthur's statement to the Veterans of Foreign Wars. Papers of Dean Acheson. (9 pages)
  • Order, as dictated by the President, from the Secretary of Defense to General Douglas MacArthur, dated August 26, 1950, ordering the withdrawal of MacArthur's statement to the 51st National Encampment of the Veterans of Foreign Wars. Papers of Harry S. Truman: President's Secretary's Files. (1 page)
  • Message from Douglas MacArthur, dated August 27, 1950, to the Secretary of Defense regarding the order to withdraw MacArthur's statement to the Veterans of Foreign Wars. Papers of Harry S. Truman: President's Secretary's Files. (3 pages)
  • Message from Louis Johnson, dated August 27, 1950, to Douglas MacArthur answering MacArthur's response to the order to withdraw MacArthur's statement to the Veterans of Foreign Wars. Papers of Harry S. Truman: President's Secretary's Files. (1 page)
  • Letter from the President, dated August 27, 1950, to Warren Austin reiterating the U.S. position on Formosa. Papers of Harry S. Truman: President's Secretary's Files. (2 pages)
  • Press release from August 28, 1950, providing on the record and background material clarifying the U.S. position with respect to Formosa. Papers of Harry S. Truman: President's Secretary's Files. (3 pages)
  • The Harry S. Truman Library and Museum is one of twelve Presidential Libraries administered by the National Archives and Records Administration.

    500 W. US Hwy. 24. Independence MO 64050
    truman.library@nara.gov
    ;
    Phone: 816-268-8200 or 1-800-833-1225;
    Fax: 816-268-8295.